Thematic volume planned for July 1, 2025
Proposal submission deadline: June 1, 2023
This special issue focuses on the critical and urgent use of digital tools, interfaces, media, and methods for the study and design of Islamic architecture, cities, and the built environment. Over recent decades, architectural historians, architects, and other specialists of the built environment have drawn increasingly on digitized databases, digital data, and processing software to reimagine the history, documentation, design, and construction of buildings, gardens, and cities wholesale. Representations of historical, contemporary, razed and never-built structures are now fully realizable, and massive corpora of information that once took many months or years to sort can now be analyzed in seconds. Yet, digital tools, infrastructures, and databases bring their own set of concerns. Databases, like all archives, do not merely contain information, they are information. And as such, they bear the marks of the epistemologies that shape them. Digital files are always remediated, meaning that they are the products of multiple human interventions, just as analogue media are. Some of the platforms that facilitate virtual reality simulations of architecture, cities, and transcontinental migrations enjoy an uncomfortable kinship with the pervasive governmental and private surveillance technologies in use today. Artificial intelligence (AI) has enormous potential to transform the way that architects, city planners, and historical preservationists work, and yet racial, gendered, ethnic, and religious biases in the datasets that machine-learning algorithms employ raise questions about the ramifications of these undertakings. Digital frameworks enable more expansive, multi-layered, and speculative investigations of buildings, cities, and spaces, but they also demand rigorous scrutiny.
With computational tools, the many lengthy geographies in Arabic, Persian, Turkish, Urdu, and other languages that scholars have long mined for textual evidence of architectural, urban design, construction, and migration practices can be analyzed at scale. This approach–what’s known in digital humanities parlance as “distant reading”–permits the identification of historical patterns, common literary forms, and intellectual networks that might have eluded analogue methods. It therefore allows texts to be understood as part of broader, interrelated phenomena rather than as isolated works. The capacity for large-scale textual processing may seem especially well-suited to works, like geographies, that are themselves large-scale and densely packed with information. However, many distant reading technologies have historically privileged left-to-right and Roman scripts, and thus betray disciplinary biases that require their own rumination and interpretation.
1. What does it mean to investigate and design the built environment through a data-centric lens? What do digital approaches offer disciplines that are materially and pragmatically oriented? And how do we maintain any critical distance from the digital when we are also irretrievably and fully immersed within it?
2. How does the computer see architectural forms and styles? How do large image datasets provide a corpus for reimagining architecture, landscape, city planning, and historic preservation in the Islamic world? What does AI—machine learning and its algorithms, especially—bring to the design process?
3. What roles do digital databases and archives play in the design and study of architecture in the Islamic world today? Who has ready access to these materials, and why? How have earlier histories of classification, information design, and computers come to bear on contemporary naming authorities, information retrieval, and metadata management?
4. How can (and should) computers and digital processes be used to reconstitute buildings, cities, landscapes, and built environments that have been destroyed, replaced, looted, or never excavated? Towards what ends might these same technologies be employed to speculatively imagine architecture that was never built, or to investigate state violence and violations of human rights? What are the ethical and practical implications of these enterprises?
5. How do digital technologies remediate architectural photographs, plans, drawings, and other media, and what are the broader ramifications of these processes? What connections, if any, do these phenomena have with the histories of earlier media?
6. What are the promises and pitfalls of big data approaches to the study of architecture and architectural history? How might current and historical acts of state-sponsored surveillance, documentation, and data science inflect and inform these endeavors?
7. In what ways are current digital tools and approaches like digital mapping with GIS, distant reading, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence suited—or ill-suited—to the study of architecture and space in the Islamic world? How should the digital be leveraged towards more emic ends, if at all?
8. How have digital technologies made previously “hidden” architectural histories of marginalized communities more visible? What are the costs and benefits of making information belonging (or that once belonged) to vulnerable and underrepresented groups publicly accessible?
9. How might digital tools and processes bridge the study of the Islamic built environment with that of other artifacts bearing pictorial representations of architecture and space, such as manuscripts, printed books, photographs, and ceramic tiles? How might the digital challenge long-standing disciplinary boundaries that have removed architecture from the study of portable media?