Lecture: Maarten Delbeke: "Beauty, corruption and lies. Architecture and its uses between Perrault & Piranesi" (Florence, 22 Feb 2016)

Maarten Delbeke: Beauty, corruption and lies. Architecture and its uses between Perrault and Piranesi

Evening lecture
22.02.2016, 18:00 h
Kunsthistorisches Institut in Florenz – Max-Planck-Institut
Palazzo Grifoni Budini Gattai, Via dei Servi 51, 50122 Firenze
Organized by the “Ethics and Architecture” project
In his last publication of vedute, the Différentes vues de quelques restes de trois grands édifices qui subsistent encore dans le milieu de l’ancienne ville de Pesto (1778) Giambattista Piranesi turned his attention to the three buildings at Paestum, the ancient Greek settlement south of Naples that had attracted increasing attention of architects, antiquarians and travelers from the mid-eighteenth century onwards. As a vociferous participant in the European debates about the origins of architecture, the architecture of Antiquity, and the relative merits of Greek and Roman architecture, Piranesi was stimulated to examine these very ancient classical buildings on Italian soil.
Piranesi’s interpretation of Paestum is founded on a reflection about the historical relationship between the beauty and use of architecture. Benchmarking his suppositions about the character of Paestum’s builders against his architectural judgment about the design of the buildings, Piranesi defines architectural beauty as a function of decorum. As such, Piranesi’s reflections on Paestum not only mark the logical conclusion of his earlier architectural theoretical writings, but also apply to particular buildings ideas about judging architecture that were developed one century earlier by the brothers Perrault, in the 1673 translation of Vitruvius, the Ordonnance des cinq espèces des colonnes and the Parallèle des anciens et des modernes. There, in a reflection based on the closing paragraphs of Vitruvius’ Book VI, the Perraults attempt to identify the different competences and authorities that are involved in judging the quality of buildings. Precisely because these different factors ultimately lead to one, single judgment of value, issues pertaining to beauty (such a ornament and proportion) become closely intertwined with matters of use, custom and tradition. It is this intertwinement that ultimately inscribes beauty in human history, and makes it a potential matter of corruption and lies.
Maarten Delbeke is Professor of the History and Theory of Architecture at the Department of Architecture and Urban Planning at Ghent University.

Share this post

News from the field

GUD Review

Review editors Nicola Campri Claudia Mainardi Luigi Mandraccio Any experience regarding reality is grounded on what has already happened. Reviewing is a primary cognitive and critical process, which structures our relationship with real world through a retrospective...

PALLADIO AND COMFORT IN THE WELL-DESIGNED HOUSE

68th Course on Palladian Architecture PALLADIO AND COMFORT IN THE WELL-DESIGNED HOUSE Vicenza + Veneto, 27th August - 2nd September 2026 What was life like in a Palladian villa or palace? How were heating and cooling managed, and how did the bathrooms and kitchens...

EAAE Cagliari 2026 Annual Conference

Thirty years after the proclamation of Bigness, a vision of architecture conceived as a scalar device of urban power, we are now in a position to critically reassess its ambitions and limitations. That moment in architectural discourse, fueled by a strong confidence...

Stoà Journal #17 REVISIONI, CRITICS

Architectural education is structured, within the design studio, through a precise sequence of reviews that articulate the process into successive stages of definition and verification: desk critiques, formalised intermediate assessments, and final presentations. Far...